Autograph Authentication – Joe DiMaggio

Confidence Grade: C (Likely NOT Authentic)

---

Overview

This report provides a forensic-level analysis of a baseball purportedly signed by Joe DiMaggio, a high-risk autographer under the classification rules. The examination applies magnified analysis to evaluate structure, reproduction, and writer identity. While the signature was executed with natural handwriting characteristics, significant stylistic deviations from Joe DiMaggio’s established signature warrant a “Wrong-Hand” classification, capping the possible grade at C.

---

Forensic Ink and Substrate Evaluation

• Ink Type: Appears to be blue ballpoint ink, a medium consistent with DiMaggio-era signings.
• Ink Flow & Absorption: Shows ink feathering along stitch contours, indicative of real fluid ink absorption.
• Substrate Compression: Viewed under magnification, the signature presses into the leather with genuine pressure variance—there’s no evidence of surface-sitting ink consistent with mechanical transfers.
• Verdict: No signs of reproduction, autopen, digital print, or photocopy elements. The writing is clearly handwritten with ink absorbed appropriately by rawhide.

---

Individual Signature Analysis

“Joe”

• The “J” is executed with a large forward loop, but lacks the tightly cinched counter-curve seen in authenticated specimens.
• The “o” is more circular and open than typical, lacking the tight, upward flourish DiMaggio often produced.
• The flow into the “e” is disconnected or hesitant, lacking the natural cursive glide.

“Di”

• The “D” is angular and structured unlike DiMaggio’s historic rounded, fluid “D,” which typically loops deeply and connects smoothly.
• The “i” is placed too far from the “D,” lacks the expected proximity and flow.

“Maggio”

• The “M” bevels unnaturally with symmetrical loops that look mannered; DiMaggio’s “M” was usually asymmetrical and quick, often merging into the following letters.
• The “a” and double “g”s are inconsistently constructed; one “g” loops backwards unrealistically.
• Suffix strokes trail unnaturally straight and deliberate, lacking muscle-memory rhythm.

---

Collective Signature Analysis

• Stroke Fluidity: The entire signature lacks confident rotational momentum and appears segmented in execution.
• Spacing & Alignment: Excessive evenness between letters where DiMaggio’s hand often created letter collisions or signature stacking.
• Entry/Exit Patterns: Non-consistent with known habits and flow of DiMaggio’s signature end strokes.
• Hallmark Features: The angular “D,” unconvincing “M,” and irregular “g” loops depart from historically documented models.

---

Red Flags

Class A — Structural Identity Failures

1. “D” Construction (Independent Failure 1): Angular, non-looping, and spatially detached—a marked departure from DiMaggio’s signature construction of this letter.
2. “Maggio” Letter Architecture (Independent Failure 2): The symmetrical “M” and unnatural “g” loops indicate foreign muscle-memory.

These two are structurally independent signature mechanisms; together they justify the “C” classification, even absent reproduction markers.

Class B — Contextual / Qualitative Concerns

• Decorative signature rhythm inconsistent with DiMaggio’s signing behavior.
• Letter spacing too even, hinting at rehearsal or forgery.
• No provenance, COA, or authentication markings visible within the frame.
• Joe DiMaggio is a High-Risk Autographer, triggering enhanced scrutiny.

---

Market Comparison and Similar Item Sales

⚠️ Limitation: No verified exemplar comparisons are provided in-session, and external databases are not accessible in this evaluation context. Therefore, pixel-level or exact horizontal match analysis cannot be confirmed.

Nonetheless, existing knowledge of DiMaggio’s authentic styles reveals that deviations in this example conflict with most phase-specific autograph variants known from the 1950s through the 1990s.

---

Final Conclusion

This signature, while handwritten, demonstrates substantive structural deviation from Joe DiMaggio’s authentic style. The observed architecture and stylistic execution trigger the Wrong-Hand Veto, capping the confidence grade at C.

Confidence Grade: C – Likely NOT Authentic

Submitted Image: