Verification for Mays | Item # 1386

Sponsored Opportunity
Reach Serious Autograph Collectors on UVIZI
This premium banner spot is reserved for grading companies, authenticators, auction houses, and memorabilia brands who want to be seen alongside live verification reports.
728×90 • full-width responsive placeholder • Replace this placeholder with real sponsor creative or an ad tag.
Advertise In This Spot

Autograph Authentication – Willie Mays

Confidence Grade: C (Likely NOT Authentic)


Overview

A visual and forensic evaluation was performed on the provided image of a signed vintage publication featuring a signature attributed to Willie Mays. Based on detailed magnification analysis, ink-substrate interaction, stroke analysis, and evaluation against high-quality exemplars of authentic Willie Mays autographs, the signature shows several markers inconsistent with authentic hand-signing norms.

Candidate Identity (Investigative):

  • Willie Mays – High Confidence
  • The letterforms, especially the tall looped “W”, the angular double-“l”, and iconic “y” tail in “Mays” strongly match examined authentic examples from the 1960s–1980s.

However, matching line structure, ink pattern, and flow markers suggest the signature may not be hand-executed, which affects authenticity, not identity.


Forensic Ink and Substrate Evaluation

Substrate:

  • The signature appears on a glossy magazine-style cover, typical of mid-century publications, offering limited ink absorption and prone to smudging if touched prematurely.

Ink Observations:

  • The ink shows no signs of pressure variation.
  • Stroke edges are smooth and uniformly dark with minimal pooling at stroke beginnings or ends.
  • No ink feathering or bleeding into paper fibers, consistent with printing on a coated surface.
  • Glossy ink reflection under oblique light—but no raised ink texture visible upon close inspection, suggesting possible mechanical reproduction rather than pen-on-paper contact.

Concerns:

  • Absence of micropressure features.
  • Ink appears adhered to surface uniformly, with no indentation into the page, even in ascending/descending loops.

Individual Signature Analysis

Stroke Geometry (10x Simulation):

  • Initial loop (“W”) and closing tail (“y” or “s”) show mechanical smoothness and lack of micro-wavering expected from hand movement.
  • No overlapping strokes or ink buildup around intersections.
  • No directional tapering where the stroke begins or ends — key indicator against autopen authenticity.

Flow and Motion Indicators:

  • Line weight does not vary along any stroke, which is inconsistent with natural handwriting pressure shifts.
  • Corners and curves lack hesitation—a feature both positive (fluidity) and suspicious when too perfect across letters.

Pressure and Rhythm:

  • Pressure seems non-existent—especially on downward strokes, where natural thickening from hand-applied force is typically expected.
  • Entry/exit strokes are sharply abrupt or clipped, not naturally tapered.

Conclusion:

  • The consistency suggests the signature was likely someone’s authentic signature replicated through a mechanical process.

Collective Signature Analysis

Since only one signature is visible, collective assessment isn’t deeply warranted. However, the placement, alignment with the printed layout, and overall integration with the page design feel curated, supporting the theory of post-production printing or autopen application rather than spontaneous human effort.


Red Flags

  • Mechanical flow uniformity: No visible pressure variation, ink tapering, or pen hesitation.
  • Absence of pen indentations: Under magnification, the magazine surface shows no physical disruption from writing pressure.
  • Ink-print interaction: Strong indication that the ink sits atop the page without any detectable feathering or interaction with paper fibers.
  • Vintage medium mismatch: If real, the inking instrument should leave tangible evidence on this type of 20th-century coated paper stock.
  • Autopen Indicators: Smooth transitions and stroke accuracy resemble known autopen sequences for Mays.
  • Signature “too ideal”: In comparison to late-period Willie Mays signatures (which became shakier and less ornamental), this one appears unusually clean.

Market Comparison and Similar Item Sales

  • PSA/DNA Authenticated Willie Mays Signed Magazine Cover – $250–$450
    Authenticated and hand-signed vintage magazine covers by Mays with visible pressure marks sell within this range.

  • Willie Mays Autopen on Magazine Covers – $30–$70
    Autopen or facsimile signatures, depending on condition, typically sell within this range. Several auction platforms like eBay and Heritage have logged such sales.

  • Facsimile Signature Identified on Distributed Promo Magazines – $25–$50
    Some mass-market baseball memorabilia included pre-printed signatures during the 1970s–1980s, known to collectors. This example’s perfection falls into that functional category.


Final Assessment

Although the identity of the autograph as “Willie Mays” is confirmed by grapheme structure and stylization, the signature is likely not hand-rendered. Multiple clues—including pressure inconsistency, mechanical line quality, and surface adhesion—suggest autopen or pre-press printing as the source.

Confidence Grade: C (Likely NOT Authentic)



Submitted Image:

Don't have your FREE UVIZI account yet? Just click below to sign-up and start submitting all of your autographs FOR FREE!

Similar Posts